MultiverseWarriors

Well i saw in the game that admin wants to hear players opinion about some of his ideas to lower at or increase covert requirements.

Well i really dont get the idea of those things, ofcourse i understand that there might be multies who dishes their at to other accounts but it would be better if admin would monitor the game better to catch them and not let them do what they are doing now cause they will be dishing those AT further just will be loging in not once three weeks but once every one and half week. Cause other thing of reaching something and not having enough AT to do it alone just simply doesnt have its point because there are not many players worth hitting and you even cant farm 500 at in one go. And if you want to stop one player from massing entire alliance you shouldnt have decreased and later increased the turns needed for attacks. And covert requirements doesnt bother me at all. So i am thinking that admin is just trying to look active without doing any real work and creating new updates, cause now the only thing which is worth something is turn and resources trading, and still that feature is not really finished cause its not trading its giving of resources and if you recieve some resources from others you dont have to give them something. So you can easily scam other players. And ofcourse you might get bad reputation but who the h3ll cares about it???

Moved / Title Edited - Saphirin

I don't think multis are really the concern, or rather they are, but where do you draw the line between multis and accounts that simply aren't playing much? Sending out whatever they've earned when they can be bothered to login. You're right about the fact that it won't change anything, they will simply have to login more often. Although, depending on how low the limit was made, anyone who's logging in every couple days, or at least every week might as well be playing anyways, and if they are multis, being forced to login more often and consistently doing the same thing might make them more obvious, and easier to catch.



What does that have to do with anything? If you're massing an alliance, even the old turn rates would only result in you getting one or two less people if you were sitting on a thousand turns, not really a big day either way. And even so, that was a maf update, pointing it out now isn't particularly relevant unless you're trying to suggest that it should be changed back to what it was originally.

But as far as attacks go, I agree that it doesn't have much of a point. At most, it simply forces players to be in contact with other players to supply additional turns if they want to do more massings. I wouldn't call that a bad thing really, just not really sure the forced communication outweighs the inconvenience of not being able to take care of as much on your own.



The covert part I do like. As it is, covert kind of sucks as a system. Recons don't cost anything, and there's nothing more to it than simply how many spies you can train. Increasing the covert you need to see things doesn't do anything to improve that, but it does at least add a little more incentive to keeping a covert in place.

As for the potential of scamming, I kind of like it that way. Has a more "real" feel to it, and forces an element of trust into trading.



Who cares? I'd like some actual new features too, but would you rather nothing gets touched at all?

i like the changes he already made....dont like any of what he just put out.....don't lower the amount of att. turns one can hold...and leave the cov. alone....

I am good with having a 1000 att turns. And the cov is good where it is. Or maybe the cov can go to half. Less att means less fun. And will mean that less people will play. But if that is goal I gues we can go Mafs new game.

Yes i would rather like he leaves the game as it is and creates some new updates instead of cahnging something small in the game as it is and doing nothing more.

i love the money and point tradein but the attacks should be left alone it totaly gives a major advantage to alot of players and some alliances

I agree about not liking the turns... I feel it has a very strong potential to be abused.

Reduce the # of turns available, up the # of turns required for attacks, or do away with turn sending altogether. Inactive accounts should not be able to just log in and send off turns.

Bigger issue is the multies, regular monitoring needs to be happening.

Sending $$, well, suppose that's good...

I see work being needed in the covert department. perhaps running spy missions should take turns? close the gap on power required to see someones $$/units. forget what it is at now, be good to have a few more ???"s out there.

just wondering why we don't have an attack based on covert power yet?

Maf wanted to have it done somehwere after his next update, that thing about destroying storage bays or whatever it was again...